1996 Ford Aerostar Review
Price Estimate: $522 - $830
Edmunds' Expert Review
by the Edmunds Experts
What’s new
Smoother shifting transmission debuts, along with revised air conditioning controls and a new radio with visible controls. Solar-tinted glass is standard.
For sale near Layton, UT
Vehicle overview
Back in 1986, when Ford launched the rear-wheel-drive Aerostar, front-drive minivans had not yet turned into sales superstars. Chevrolet's Astro was the principal--if larger--competition, and neither ever reached the best-seller list. When Ford finally turned to front-drive with the modern 1995 Windstar, many thought the archaic, pointy-snout Aerostar would be history, but Ford has decided to keep the old-timer around for a while.
As a concession to modest sales, only a single XLT model is available, with seven-passenger seating. An electronic four-wheel-drive system is available, but only as part of a preferred equipment package on extended-length passenger vans. Aerostars also come with a standard-length body, but both ride the same 118.9-inch wheelbase. Rear antilock braking is standard on all Aerostars, and side-impact guard beams have been installed at both the front doors and sliding side door.
Air conditioning is standard fare, and features improved function and controls for 1996. Only a handful of options can be ordered. Manual shift is not available, so all Aerostars have a new four-speed overdrive automatic transmission designed to deliver smoother shifts. Base engine is a 135 horsepower, 3.0-liter V6, but extended-length Aerostars can have a newly enhanced 155-horsepower, 4.0-liter V6 instead. Commercial vans come only in the standard body, with the smaller engine.
For 1996, Aerostars get a new radio design with larger station buttons, new alloy wheels, and standard solar tinted glass. A folding seat bed can be ordered with dual captain's chairs this year.
Aerostars handle capably, with easy steering and light but strong braking action. Acceleration to expressway speeds is excellent, and downshifts arrive crisply. These rear-drivers ride comfortably, too, remaining composed even over washboard surfaces. An Aerostar feels highly stable on the road and in the city.
Yes, it's truck-like in character, but with enough car-type qualities to make for a satisfying experience on the road. On the down side, tiny front windows are no help in terms of visibility, and riders have to climb a little to get inside. Far from state-of-the-art in minivan design, Aerostars still offer a mild medley of virtues.
Cost to DriveCost to drive estimates for the 1996 Ford Aerostar 3dr Cargo Minivan and comparison vehicles are based on 15,000 miles per year (with a mix of 55% city and 45% highway driving) and energy estimates of $3.29 per gallon for regular unleaded in Utah.
Monthly estimates based on costs in Utah
$220/mo for Aerostar Base
Aerostar Base
vs
$197/mo
Avg. Midsize Minivan
See Edmunds pricing data
Has Your Car's Value Changed?
Used car values are constantly changing. Edmunds lets you track your vehicle's value over time so you can decide when to sell or trade in.
Ford Aerostar Reviews
Owner Reviews
5(44%)
4(46%)
3(8%)
2(2%)
1(0%)
Most Helpful Owner Reviews
Trending topics
My Third Aerostar
4.88 out of 5 starsDanny Hardwick, 07/17/2010
1995 Ford Aerostar XLT 3dr Ext Minivan AWD
I bought a used 1996 Aerostar in 1998 with 66,000 miles on it, and retired it with 225,000 miles on it when it started losing compression in two cylinders. Bought a 1995 with 99,000 miles on it in 2002. It now has 261,500 miles on it and still running strong. however I now live where we get heavy snows, and the two wheel drive does not climb the hills in snow if someone gets in front of … you driving less than 30 miles per hour. I drove to Show Low AZ this morning and bought a 1995 AWD extended van with 116400 miles on it and drove it back to Ruidoso, NM. I could not have been happier if I had bought a new car off the lot. This one had been well kept, no rust, and only two door dings.
Best vehicle I have ever owned
4.75 out of 5 starsAndy, 01/14/2010
1996 Ford Aerostar XLT 3dr Ext Minivan
The best vehicle I have ever owned. It has been very reliable, comfortable, inexpensive to operate, handy and a very useful vehicle. I'm still driving her after twelve and a half years and she has held up well. When ever my family's vehicles break down or they need a van they barrow the old Aerostar.
Aerostar
4.25 out of 5 starssjohn, 06/24/2007
1995 Ford Aerostar XLT 3dr Ext Minivan
This is the best vehicle I have ever owned. I bought it new and have spent almost nothing on repairs. It now has 170,000 miles and still runs strong. Interior and extetior still look great. Wish Ford still made a vehicle this good. The 4.0 liter engine is great.
1995 AWD AEROSTAR
5 out of 5 starsAllen Ballard, 03/13/2007
1995 Ford Aerostar XLT 3dr Ext Minivan AWD
My third AWD Aerostar and best yet. I own a second 1995 AWD, my first Aerostar was a 1990 short van. All 3 vans have have been rock solid dependable with normal maintenance issues such as front CV boots, steering knuckles/bearings being the most costly, occurring in the 130-140K mile range. These vans were built at Hazelwood, MO by some of the best people that Ford has. I enjoyed working … with St Louis Assembly as a supplier QA Engineer for over 13 years so I speak from experience. Both vans have over 184K and plenty of life remaining. I am now considering another 97 AWD model. Gas mileage = 17- 20mpg & same as a Windstar which has less room and utility. Aerostar's build quality is far superior.
We have a limited number of reviews for the 1996 Ford Aerostar, so we've included reviews for other years of the Aerostar since its last redesign.
1996 Aerostar Highlights
Base
Engine Type | Gas |
---|---|
Combined MPG | 18 MPG |
Cost to Drive | $220/month |
Drivetrain | rear wheel drive |
Safety
NHTSA Overall Rating
The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration offers independent analysis.
- Frontal Barrier Crash RatingOverallNot RatedDriver4 / 5Passenger3 / 5
- Side Crash RatingOverallNot Rated
- Side Barrier RatingOverallNot RatedDriverNot RatedPassengerNot Rated
- Combined Side Barrier & Pole RatingsFront SeatNot RatedBack SeatNot Rated
- RolloverRolloverNot RatedDynamic Test ResultNo TipRisk Of RolloverNot Rated
IIHS Rating
The Insurance Institute of Highway Safety uses extensive crash tests to determine car safety.
- Small Overlap Front Driver-Side TestNot Tested
- Small Overlap Front Passenger-Side TestNot Tested
- Moderate Overlap Front Test – OriginalPoor
- Moderate Overlap Front Test – UpdatedNot Tested
- Side Impact Test – OriginalNot Tested
- Side Impact Test – UpdatedNot Tested
- Roof Strength TestNot Tested
- Rear Crash Protection / Head RestraintNot Tested
Related Used 1996 Ford Aerostar info
Vehicle reviews of used models
- Honda CR V 2021 Review
- Chevrolet Corvette 2021 Review
- Chevrolet Impala 2020 Review
- BMW 8 Series 2020 Review
- Nissan GT R 2020 Review
Shop used vehicles in your area
- Used Acura ILX 2015 For Sale
- Used Acura ILX 2016
- Used Acura ILX 2018 For Sale
- Used Acura ILX 2019
- Used Acura ILX 2023
- Used Acura Integra 2013
- Used Acura Integra 2021
- Used Acura Legend 2011
- Used Acura Legend 2020
- Used Acura MDX 2010
Popular new car reviews and ratings
- 2024 Toyota Corolla
- New BMW X5
- New Honda Ridgeline
- 2025 Tesla Model X
- 2024 Toyota Sequoia
- 2025 Ford Maverick
- 2026 Toyota T100 News
- 2026 Honda Passport
- Hyundai Santa Fe 2025
- New Honda Accord
Research other models of
- New Ford F-150 Lightning
- 2024 Ford Maverick
- New Ford Escape
- Ford Expedition 2024
- 2025 F-150
- New Ford F-150
- Ford Ranger 2024
- New Ford F-450 Super Duty
- Ford Escape 2024
- New Ford Bronco Sport
Other models
- Used Rolls-Royce Phantom-Coupe in Coldwater, MI 2017
- Used Volvo V50 in Olympia, WA 2011
- New Kia Carnival for Sale in Arnold, MO
- Used Ford Windstar in Ellensburg, WA 2003
- Used Saab 9-7X in Bowling Green, OH 2009
- Used Chevrolet HHR in Antioch, TN 2011
- Used Fisker Karma in Bloomfield, NJ 2012
- Used Mercedes-Benz Maybach in Drexel Hill, PA 2025
- Used Chevrolet Express in Prosper, TX 2024
- Used Saturn L300 in Mullica Hill, NJ 2005